I read today on F acebook , the page of No B-Day:
Friends, if tend to indicate that the event is held only in Rome and those that are not amenable to local we do not do it because we are bad but because it is right for the good of the initiative, circoscivere the scope of responsibilities. The other local initiatives, all legitimate, they are absolutely independent from ours. We can only guarantee for the demonstration in RomeI understand the desire of the organizers of relinquish all responsibility, and found acceptable by the legal point of view, but I need a stronger political signal.
will try to explain better, helping me with the Constitution, we examined the Articles 17, 21 paragraph 1 Cost .
Article 17.
Citizens have the right to assemble peacefully and unarmed.
For meetings, even in a place open to the public notice is not required.
For meetings in the public notice must be given to the authorities, which may forbid them only for reasons of security or public safety.
For meetings, even in a place open to the public notice is not required.
For meetings in the public notice must be given to the authorities, which may forbid them only for reasons of security or public safety.
Article 21.
Everyone has the right to freely express their ideas by word,
written and every other means of communication.
written and every other means of communication.
follows from conjunction a peaceful demonstration, in which it occurs legitimately own thought, is considered an inviolable right for the citizen. The No b-day is no exception, being forbidden by their organization (and common sense of civil society) all forms of violence.
said that it is normal that organizers do not want to take responsibility for other manifestations of the various squares in Italy, there may violations of procedure (eg, was not given notice to the authorities, however, that memory must not conduct an examination of the merits), or violations during the event itself (eg, use of violence).
However, a sign of organization at the national level event, with the participation of several streets in support of a unique initiative, it would only strengthen the commitment and make it even more significant . I'm not saying that the organizers are wrong in their behavior, in fact, is the only one to hold in this case. But a more centralized supervision allows the running event of a more unified.
After the speech is absolutely correct that I do not want to divert attention from more important, namely event and its ideals . I'll be there, from individual citizens to dialogue ( perhaps even the very few who I assume will occur in the same square for the "Si-B day").
0 comments:
Post a Comment