have recently become increasingly interested in the fact check , namely to ascertain what the facts, naked and raw, without being mislead by the outline given by sensationalism or superficiality in dealing with the news. It follows my desire to start a new heading that case, in order to combat the misinformation that in my small way I think one of the worst ills afflicting our country.
today I take inspiration from what I wrote about Il Giornale :
We are the facts. As anticipated by the newspaper in recent days, most anti-Mafia prosecutors are closing the game on Silvio Berlusconi who are ready to devote even a request for confiscation of all the assets. The Prime Minister is (should) be investigated for complicity in murder in Florence, so at least hinted yesterday morning, the daily newspaper La Repubblica.Good thing is that the opening words "We the facts," because I wonder what else could have written in the opposite case ..
fact to give the news of Prime Minister investigated for complicity in the massacre by the judiciary Florentine Free , and La Repubblica. Free I find even more lacking than the professional journal (which, however, found any excuse to attack, means more or less ethical, competition). Here's what it is written today on Free :
The prime minister Silvio Berlusconi and Marcello Dell'Utri are not suspects in the investigation opened in Florence on mafia massacres of '93. Said the chief prosecutor of Florence, Giuseppe Quattrocchi , responding to journalists who asked him to comment to our title. The denial of attorney is granted and arrives as expected. "There are no inscriptions of this kind," said Quattrocchi.This is not only not Free sorry to have given a news practically unfounded, and denied by the chief prosecutor of Florence, but even that defines denial " a script."
Free obvious that they had planned, if openly publish a falsehood but you expect that the day after the individual concerned the denial. This does not make the judiciary obscure and unreliable, which makes a newspaper Libero misinformation, also knowing it.
we analyze the rest of the article:
"There are no inscriptions of this type," Quattrocchi said. And Prime Minister Berlusconi meets the first serious "allegations are unfounded and defamatory. Most of the judiciary is for this reason the left and look for a pretext to attack the prime minister"This is clear as day Berlusconi looking for any excuse to attack the judiciary, even the non-news . If the denial is entered in the register of suspects, the attack is where he is talking about Berlusconi?
The rest did not comment, being a set of "outputs spirit" of the Prime Minister and angry responses to those takes him seriously, but apart from anything I see as a way to divert attention the real news, and to bring the discussion to a more low and vulgar, I would say that is the trademark of Berlusconi .
Sorry if I used a tone too bright in some places, being my first serious post I have some problem to handle the "self control" (in the words of my old English teacher) and I would like to continue with post closer to the politically correct, not to fall into vulgarity and populism that distinguishes certain blog opposition.
0 comments:
Post a Comment